|  
                     A daily 
                      low dose of aspirin significantly reduces the number of 
                      deaths from a whole range of common cancers, an Oxford University 
                      study has found.  
                    The 
                      20% drop in all cancer deaths seen in the study 
                      adds new evidence to the debate about whether otherwise 
                      healthy people in their 40s and 50s should consider taking 
                      a low dose of aspirin each day. 
                      
                     | 
                   
                    
                    
                   | 
                 
                 
               
            
              
              Aspirin 
                is already known to be beneficial for those at high risk of heart 
                disease. But among healthy people, the benefit in lower chances 
                of heart problems only marginally outweighs the small risk of 
                stomach bleeds.  
              The large 
                size of the effect now seen in preventing cancer deaths may begin 
                to tip the balance in favour of taking aspirin, the scientists 
                suggest, but say that it is a matter for the health bodies who 
                write treatment guidelines.  
              ;These results 
                do not mean that all adults should immediately start taking aspirin,’ 
                cautions Professor Peter Rothwell of the Department of Clinical 
                Neurology at Oxford University, who led the work. ‘But they 
                do demonstrate major new benefits that have not previously been 
                factored into guideline recommendations.’  
              ‘Previous 
                guidelines have rightly cautioned that in healthy middle aged 
                people the small risk of bleeding on aspirin partly offsets the 
                benefit from prevention of strokes and heart attacks, but the 
                reductions in deaths due to several common cancers will now alter 
                this balance for many people.’ 
               
                 
                  These 
                    results do not mean that all adults should immediately start 
                    taking aspirin. But they do demonstrate major new benefits. 
                 
               
              However, he 
                adds: ‘I don’t think it’s necessarily right 
                for the person who did the research to say what guidelines should 
                be. We can’t say with absolute certainty that there won’t 
                be some unknown harm in taking aspirin for 30 years, but it looks 
                as if there would be pretty large benefits in reducing cancer 
                deaths. People have to accept there’s some uncertainty here.’ 
              Professor 
                Rothwell and colleagues recently established that a low dose of 
                aspirin (75 mg per day, or a quarter of the normal dose taken 
                for pain relief) taken for longer than five years reduces death 
                rates from bowel cancer by more than a third.  
              In this new 
                work, scientists from Oxford, Edinburgh, London and Japan used 
                data on over 670 deaths from cancer in a range of randomised trials 
                involving over 25,000 people. These trials compared daily use 
                of aspirin against no aspirin and were done originally to look 
                for any preventative effect against heart disease.  
              The results, 
                published in the Lancet, showed that aspirin reduced 
                death due to any cancer by around 20% during the trials. But the 
                benefits of aspirin only became apparent after taking the drug 
                for 5 years or more, suggesting aspirin works by slowing or preventing 
                the early stages of the disease so that the effect is only seen 
                much later.  
              After 5 years 
                of taking aspirin, the data from patients in the trials showed 
                that death rates were 34% less for all cancers and as much as 
                54% less for gastrointestinal cancers, such as oesophagus, stomach, 
                bowel, pancreas and liver cancers.  
              The researchers 
                also wanted to determine if the benefits from aspirin continued 
                over time. By using cancer registries and death records, they 
                were able to follow up what had happened to participants in three 
                of the trials.  
              They showed 
                that risk of cancer death over a period of 20 years remained 20% 
                lower for all solid cancers among those who had taken aspirin 
                (even though they would have been unlikely to have continued taking 
                aspirin after the trials finished), and 35% lower for gastrointestinal 
                cancers.  
              It took about 
                5 years to see a benefit in taking aspirin for oesophagus, pancreatic, 
                brain, and lung cancer; about 10 years for stomach and bowel cancer; 
                and about 15 years for prostate cancer. The 20-year risk of death 
                was reduced by about 10% for prostate cancer, 30% for lung cancer, 
                40% for bowel cancer and 60% for oesophagus cancer.  
              As the evidence 
                points to a delayed preventative effect against cancer, Professor 
                Rothwell believes that it would be those who started taking aspirin 
                in their late 40s or 50s – ie before people’s risk 
                of cancer starts increasing – and then continued for 20 
                to 30 years who might eventually see the most benefit. 
              Professor 
                Rothwell estimates that in terms of cost-effectiveness, taking 
                low-dose aspirin daily is likely to be much more cost-effective 
                than those interventions already used for preventing cancer, such 
                as screening for breast or prostate cancer. 
              He does note 
                that more research is necessary to understand more about the effect 
                aspirin has on cancer.  
              While this 
                study looked at how aspirin affected deaths from cancer, Professor 
                Rothwell and colleagues now aim to look at any protective effect 
                of aspirin on the incidence or progression of cancer. The researchers 
                also point out that more trial data are needed on breast cancer 
                and other cancers that particularly affect women.  
              Perhaps the 
                most important finding for the longer term is the proof of principle 
                that cancers can be prevented by simple compounds like aspirin,says 
                Professor Rothwell. 
                 
               |